Skip to content
CyStarter
Compare

Cyprus vs Malta: company formation compared

Both are EU members with English-language practice. The difference sits in tax rate and IP mechanics, in how substance is done, and in which model fits your business, not in a blanket “better”.

CriterionCyprusMalta
EU / euroEU since 2004, euro area since 2008EU since 2004, euro area since 2008
Corporate tax (standard rate)15%Higher headline rate with a refund mechanic depending on the model; review in the specific case
IP / patent box80% deduction, 3% effective on qualifying IP profits after reviewIts own IP regime; not the same mechanic as Cyprus
Language / lawEnglish, common-law shapedEnglish, its own company law
SubstanceManagement and control, local director with documented dutiesIts own substance and governance requirements
Relocation60-day rule and non-dom as a personal layer, separate from the LtdIts own residence and non-dom setting

Takeaway

Cyprus fits projects with potentially qualifying IP (3% effective after review), manageable governance in Larnaca and DACH-facing support. Malta remains relevant where existing Malta structures, particular fund or gaming ecosystems, or a different personal residence model dominate. This is a structuring choice, not a ranking.

Last updated:

Why Cyprus · Cost and scope

FAQ

Questions on this comparison

Next step

Talk through your Cyprus structure.

Tell us about your plans. We will review suitability, structure and next steps in a no-obligation initial consultation.